\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{csquotes}
\usepackage{parskip}
\usepackage{titling}

\pretitle{\dotfill\\\begin{center}}
\posttitle{\end{center}}

\title{\large\textbf{Aristotle} the Ethical Agent}
\author{Aayush Bajaj}
\date{\today}

\begin{document}

\maketitle
\dotfill


I think I could do it. I think I could build on the discovery of \textit{Deep Learning} and produce an artificial agent that behaves ethically.

I think Kant is historical and he never knew Bayesian Probability. I also think many of the papers that I studied for Essay 1 --- whilst they were written after the seminal \underline{Attention is All You Need} paper by Google --- they never realised the impact of \emph{truly} deep learning.

All of this is very speculative at the moment, but given a month to train on UNSW's HPC Katana, and time within which to study Virtue Ethics, Utilitarianism, Deontological ethics and the mathematical unions of their moral behaviours, I believe our Neural Network can learn the arbitrarily complex decision surface that would compose \emph{ethical} decisions.

Furthermore, I intend to study a Master's in Statistics, which is accompanied by research work towards the end of the post-graduate degree. I wonder if creating \enquote{Aristotle, the Ethical Agent} would be something my school would approve. And if so, combining my understanding of Probablility with my aptitude in Pytorch should yield an Agent that is in fact Kantian --- by way of leveraging the \emph{likelihood} of immoral actions to be low, and thus technically allowing the agent to \enquote{pick} in the same way a human would --- thus enabling autonomy and the existence of a Kantian AMA!

In conclusion, it is only week 3 and I am likely talking out of my ass;

\flushright
\fbox{\fbox{\fbox{\fbox{\parbox{0.5\textwidth}{
\flushleft
Que sais-je?
\flushright
--- Michel de Montaigne
}}}}}

\flushleft
Aayush
\end{document}
