<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Belief-Propagation on Aayush Bajaj's Augmenting Infrastructure</title><link>https://abaj.ai/tags/belief-propagation/</link><description>Recent content in Belief-Propagation on Aayush Bajaj's Augmenting Infrastructure</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><copyright>© 2026 Aayush Bajaj</copyright><lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:29:54 +1000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://abaj.ai/tags/belief-propagation/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Approximate Inference</title><link>https://abaj.ai/wiki/ml/pgm/approximate-inference/</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:29:54 +1000</pubDate><guid>https://abaj.ai/wiki/ml/pgm/approximate-inference/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;a
 href="https://abaj.ai/wiki/ml/pgm/inference/"
 
 
>exact inference&lt;/a> costs \(\exp(\text{treewidth})\), and real networks — image grids, dense diagnostic models, unrolled &lt;a
 href="https://abaj.ai/wiki/ml/pgm/markov-models/"
 
 
>dbns&lt;/a> — routinely have treewidth in the hundreds. approximate inference trades guaranteed answers for tractable ones, along two philosophically different roads: &lt;strong>sampling&lt;/strong> replaces the distribution with draws from it (anytime, asymptotically exact, embarrassingly parallel), and &lt;strong>approximate message passing&lt;/strong> runs exact-style propagation on graphs where its correctness proof no longer holds. this page walks the sampling ladder in the order each rung fixes the last one&amp;rsquo;s failure — forward, rejection, likelihood weighting, gibbs — then closes with loopy belief propagation.&lt;span class="margin-note" data-note="comp9418 benchmarks all four samplers against variable elimination on the icu-alarm network; the qualitative ranking below is what those experiments show">
 &lt;span class="margin-note-indicator">𐃏&lt;/span>
&lt;/span>
&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>