<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Interactions on Aayush Bajaj's Augmenting Infrastructure</title><link>https://abaj.ai/tags/interactions/</link><description>Recent content in Interactions on Aayush Bajaj's Augmenting Infrastructure</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><copyright>© 2026 Aayush Bajaj</copyright><lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2026 20:21:49 +1100</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://abaj.ai/tags/interactions/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Analysis of Variance</title><link>https://abaj.ai/wiki/ml/supervised/regression/anova/</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2026 14:00:00 +1100</pubDate><guid>https://abaj.ai/wiki/ml/supervised/regression/anova/</guid><description>&lt;p>analysis of variance compares the means of groups. it was born as its own subject, with its own tables and vocabulary, but once a categorical predictor is written as a block of indicator columns it is simply a linear gaussian model — the same \(\hat\beta = (\mathbf{X}^\top\mathbf{X})^{-1}\mathbf{X}^\top\mathbf{y}\), the same nested \(F\)-test from &lt;a
 href="https://abaj.ai/wiki/ml/supervised/regression/inference/"
 
 
>estimation &amp;amp; inference&lt;/a>. what is genuinely new is the bookkeeping: how to code a factor so the design matrix has full rank, what the coefficients then mean, and how the total variation splits into a between-groups and a within-groups part.&lt;span class="margin-note" data-note="distilled from my math5806 (applied regression analysis) week 3 notes, following dobson and barnett chapter 6">
 &lt;span class="margin-note-indicator">𐃏&lt;/span>
&lt;/span>
&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>