<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>No-Free-Lunch on Aayush Bajaj's Augmenting Infrastructure</title><link>https://abaj.ai/tags/no-free-lunch/</link><description>Recent content in No-Free-Lunch on Aayush Bajaj's Augmenting Infrastructure</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><copyright>© 2026 Aayush Bajaj</copyright><lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 08:20:16 +1000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://abaj.ai/tags/no-free-lunch/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>No Free Lunch Theorem</title><link>https://abaj.ai/wiki/ml/theory/no-free-lunch/</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 21:02:56 +1000</pubDate><guid>https://abaj.ai/wiki/ml/theory/no-free-lunch/</guid><description>&lt;p>averaged over &lt;em>all possible problems&lt;/em>, every learning algorithm is exactly as good as random guessing — and every optimiser is exactly as good as blind enumeration.&lt;span class="margin-note" data-note="the name comes from the american saloon practice of &amp;#39;free&amp;#39; lunches that you paid for in beer">
 &lt;span class="margin-note-indicator">𐃏&lt;/span>
&lt;/span>

this sounds like nihilism but is actually the sharpest possible argument &lt;em>for&lt;/em> inductive bias: an algorithm can only beat chance on some problems by losing to chance on others, so the whole game of machine learning is choosing whose lunch to eat.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>