<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Pac-Learning on Aayush Bajaj's Augmenting Infrastructure</title><link>https://abaj.ai/tags/pac-learning/</link><description>Recent content in Pac-Learning on Aayush Bajaj's Augmenting Infrastructure</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><copyright>© 2026 Aayush Bajaj</copyright><lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2026 18:03:57 +1100</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://abaj.ai/tags/pac-learning/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Learning Theory</title><link>https://abaj.ai/wiki/ml/theory/learning-theory/</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2026 15:00:00 +1100</pubDate><guid>https://abaj.ai/wiki/ml/theory/learning-theory/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;a
 href="https://abaj.ai/wiki/ml/theory/no-free-lunch/"
 
 
>No free lunch&lt;/a> says a learner with no inductive bias cannot generalise. Computational learning theory turns that into arithmetic: restrict the hypothesis space \(H\), and the number of examples needed to generalise grows with the logarithm of \(|H|\), or with its VC dimension when \(H\) is infinite. A second strand counts mistakes instead of examples, for learners that predict online.&lt;/p>
&lt;h2 id="the-setting">the setting&lt;a href="#the-setting" class="post-heading__anchor" aria-hidden="true">#&lt;/a>
&lt;/h2>
&lt;p>Training minimises the empirical risk: pick \(h \in H\) with the smallest training error. With \(H\) unrestricted this overfits, since a look-up table has zero training error. Learning theory asks when a restricted \(H\) makes empirical-risk minimisation safe.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>