<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Patchify on Aayush Bajaj's Augmenting Infrastructure</title><link>https://abaj.ai/tags/patchify/</link><description>Recent content in Patchify on Aayush Bajaj's Augmenting Infrastructure</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><copyright>© 2026 Aayush Bajaj</copyright><lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 08:20:25 +1000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://abaj.ai/tags/patchify/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Visual Transformers (ViT)</title><link>https://abaj.ai/wiki/ml/dl/computer-vision/visual-transformers/</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 21:02:56 +1000</pubDate><guid>https://abaj.ai/wiki/ml/dl/computer-vision/visual-transformers/</guid><description>&lt;p>the vision transformer asks a blunt question: if attention replaced recurrence for text, can it replace convolution for images? the answer (dosovitskiy et al. 2020, &lt;a
 href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.11929"
 
 
 class="link--external" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer"
 
>&lt;em>an image is worth 16x16 words&lt;/em>&lt;/a>) is yes — chop the image into patches, treat each patch as a token, and feed the sequence to a standard &lt;a
 href="https://abaj.ai/wiki/ml/dl/transformers/"
 
 
>transformer&lt;/a> encoder with almost no vision-specific machinery.&lt;span class="margin-note" data-note="the title is literal: a 16x16 pixel patch is one &amp;#39;word&amp;#39; in the image&amp;#39;s sentence">
 &lt;span class="margin-note-indicator">𐃏&lt;/span>
&lt;/span>
&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>